Monday Night Football tonight Streaming TV why Vikings will stifle Brees Saints

Wiki Article

Do you hear that? Is . Is . Is Monday Night Football's music?! Welcome back, "Monday Night Football." Oh how we've mi Peyton Manning Jersey sed you. From to the football itself, we've longed for you like a Stark longs for a family reunion. Finally, you've made it back home and retaken your rightful place above the battlefield.To welcome us back to "Monday Night Football," two matchups await this week, with the hosting the and the hosting the . This preview will focus on the Saints-Vikings matchup, and you can find In the lead-up to the game, new Saints running back , who spent the first decade of his career running through defenders in Minnesota, . Unfortunately for Peterson, I just don't see that happening. For reasons I'll get to below, I'm taking the Vikings in this season's first installment of "Monday Night Football."The prediction: Vikings 24, Saints 21How to watch, streamKickoff:Sept. 11, 7:10 p.m.TV:ESPN (Check local listings)Streaming: (Try for free)1. Home Brees vs. Road Brees is one of the greatest quarterbacks in the history of the game. But he isn't the same quarterback on the road. That's not to say Brees has been bad on the road. He just isn't superhuman away from the Superdome. Win-lo sComp. percentageYPATD pct.INT pct.RatingHome71-4667.58 percent7.806.18 pct.2.43 pct.101.4Away60-5765.69 percent7.304.44 pct.2.60 pct.91.2Alleviating Brees' road woes is the fact that the Vikings' U.S. Bank Stadium is covered by a roof (). In Brees' career, he has posted a 102.5 pa ser rating in domes while his rating drops to 90.3 outdoors and 91.0 in stadiums with retractable roofs. Brees will be indoors Monday night. That matters.But there's another reason why Brees may struggle in this game.2. The Vikings' dominant secondary The Vikings boast one of the league's best defenses, specifically because their secondary is downright dominant. That secondary should be able to handle the Saints' high-flying aerial attack, which is led by Brees and receiver .First up is the Vikings' 27-year-old cornerback , who snagged five interceptions in 14 games last season. According to Pro Football Focus, Rhodes allowed an NFL-low 47.0 pa ser rating in coverage. Fifth on that list -- one spot ahead of -- was , who allowed a 62.0 pa ser rating. Newman, 39, only totaled one interception last season, which is why he's often overlooked as one of the game's best corners. But he shouldn't be overlooked. He deserves praise, especially considering his age. Together, Rhodes and Newman surrendered 65 receptions on 131 targets (49.6 percent) for 674 yards (5.1 YPA) with three touchdowns, and six interceptions, per PFF. You won't find a better cornerback duo, statistically speaking. It's worth noting, that Newman isn't even the Vikings' second cornerback. That role belongs to the younger, but much more inconsistent , who is listed ahead of Newman on the depth chart. Last season, Waynes racked up three interceptions and allowed four touchdowns and a 77.4 pa ser rating in coverage, according to PFF. Those aren't bad numbers -- his pa ser rating in coverage ranked 18th among all cornerbacks -- but it's impo sible to know which version of Waynes the Vikings will get Monday night. Take a look at his weekly grading chart via PFF:Waynes remains the Vikings' biggest question mark heading into the season and this game. If Waynes is at his worst, Brees will carve him up.And then there's , who landed with the Vikings last week In 2016, Brock picked off only one pa s with the , but he was PFF's 21st highest-graded cornerback. Unfortunately, Brock is .Even if he can't play, the Vikings are well equipped to prevent Brees from popping off. I didn't even mention Vikings safety , who finished last year Chris Wilcox Jersey as PFF's 12th-best safety. There's a reason why the Vikings gave up the third-fewest pa sing yards last year and, according to Football Outsiders, That reason is Mike Zimmer and the talented players he gets to coach up.3. Peterson won't get personal revengeThe natural response to the previous section may be to point toward Peterson and . Can't the Saints lean on their running game?It's true that the Vikings are worse at defending the run than the pa s. But they're not awful, just average. A year ago, they ranked 20th in rushing yards allowed, 17th in yards allowed per carry, and .Still, the idea persists. Why don't the Saints go run-heavy instead of testing the Vikings' proven secondary? They probably won't because that's not what Sean Payton does. The Saints ranked 19th in rushing attempts last season, 20th in 2015, 19th in 2014, 26th in 2013, 29th in 2012, and -- you get the point. Meanwhile, they ranked second in pa s attempts last season, second in 2015, second in 2014, fourth in 2013, second in 2012, and -- again, you get the point.Part of that is because of to the Saints' horrific defense, but it also has to do with Payton having Drew freakin' Brees to throw the ball. And to no one's surprise, they're damn good at throwing the ball around. Last season, they finished fifth in yards per attempt and tied for the second-most pa sing touchdowns.Even if the Saints opt for a more balanced approach on Monday night, it'd be surprising to see Peterson "stick it" to his former team. For one, he's 32 years old and . Two, he's in a crowded backfield with the incumbent, Mark Ingram, and the flashy rookie, . Ingram and Peterson are , so expect them to take on similarly sized workloads. The over/under for Peterson's rushing output in . I'd take the under considering the last time we saw Peterson he was averaging 1.9 yards per carry and the next time we see him he'll be splitting carries with Ingram. Now, if he were facing a defense similar to his own, I'd be more optimistic. But he's not. 4. About that Saints defenseThe Saints' defense is not the Vikings' defense. They're on the other end of the spectrum. Last season, they allowed the sixth-most yards and the second-most points in football. They were Things aren't going to get better in 2017. To remedy the problem, the Saints went out and drafted cornerback with Lattimore may be the best rookie cornerback and he may be a great player eventually, but expecting one player -- one rookie -- to fix the catastrophe that is the Saints' defense is asking far too much.Yes, I'm also aware that Saints brought in linebacker , but I'm choosing to ignore that signing because Te'o is and he wasn't any good before suffering that injury. They also signed linebacker A.J. Klein, but Klein has never started more than eight games in a season.Keep in mind that the Saints lost defensive lineman for the season. That's not their fault or Fairley's, but his absence will be felt on the field. This perpetually awful Saints defense will be awful again. It'll begin Monday night.5. Stop with the bashingAnd so, Bradford is going to experience a succe sful outing. That's largely Darius Leonard Jersey because of the Saints defense being stuck in a permanent state of ineptitude and also because of Bradford's ability as an NFL quarterback.Let's stop with the Bradford bashing. He's not the awful quarterback he's made out to be. In his first season with the Vikings, he set an NFL record with a 71.6 completion percentage. The common response to that stat is that he completed all of those pa ses because he's a dink-and-dunk quarterback. That's not nece sarily false, but to put his style of play into context, his 7.02 yards per attempt ranked 19th in the NFL. , an alleged gunslinger, averaged 0.01 more yards per attempt than Bradford. Furthermore, even though Bradford doesn't go deep often, when he does, he's unstoppable. According to PFF, Bradford accumulated the third-highest pa ser rating (121.5) on pa ses that traveled at least 20 yards downfield. Only and were better in that department.Bradford also compiled a 20:5 touchdown-to-interception ratio and generated a 99.3 pa ser rating, which ranked one spot behind Brees' pa ser rating. He did all of that despite getting sacked 37 times or, put another way, he averaged a sack on 18.8 percent of his dropbacks (tied for the sixth-highest sack rate, per PFF). He overcame that by the league's second-highest pa ser rating under pre sure, according to PFF.No one is saying Bradford is on the same level as Brees, but he's a solid quarterback when healthy, a quarterback who gives his team a chance to win. Bleacher Report's Doug Farrar, who knows more about football than I ever will, agrees. In his weekly quarterback rankings for Bleacher Report, Farrar ranked Bradford . Here's why:And that's the real story of Bradford's 2016he learned a different system and was entirely efficient despite perhaps the worst pa s-blocking offensive line in the league. Bradford is able to do this because of his great accuracy, and that starts with his mechanicshe steps into throws with efficient motion, and he also throws with the sense of anticipation that will allow his receivers to move into defined openings. That sense of timing elevates him in to the NFL's top level at the position. Only had a better quarterback rating under pre sure last season than Bradford's 87.7, and with the Vikings upgrading their offensive line a bit in the offseason, that should help a bit.Bradford and the Vikings' offense drew a favorable matchup to kickoff their season. Look for Minnesota -- with rookie playing a big role too -- to exploit that matchup.
https://augustocqd09653.corpfinwiki.com/7728269/frustrated_panthers_to_reportedly_meet_with_owner_about_protest_restrictions
Click here Click here